
It's been 15 days since I have posted a question and still no answers. This is really pathetic. If you cant respond a basic question in a week or two then the same should be mentioned. Its really unprofessional and dissatisfying service provide by Redid gurus. Reposting for your reference, Hi expert, In 2010, I made a one-time lump-sum investment of approximately 50000k each in the following 13 funds. I have not added fresh capital to these funds since 2010: DSP-BR India TIGER Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW DSP-BR Top 100 Equity Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW Franklin India Flexi Cap Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW HSBC Large Cap Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW (Formerly L&T India Large Cap Fund / HSBC Advantage India Fund) HSBC Progressive Themes Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW Nippon India Growth Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW Nippon India Power & Infra Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW SBI Magnum Midcap Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW SBI Contra Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW (Formerly SBI Magnum Sector Funds Umbrella Contra) Sundaram Large Cap Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW Sundaram Diversified Equity Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW HDFC Infrastructure Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW Edelweiss Mid Cap Fund – Regular Plan - IDCW (Payout) Part from the above active monthly SIPs (Current Portfolio – ₹40,000/month total) I am currently investing ₹10,000 per month in each of the following 4 funds: HDFC Children's Gift Fund – Regular Plan (Growth) (Includes lock-in) Mirae Asset Large & Midcap Fund – Regular Plan (Growth) (Formerly Mirae Asset Emerging Bluechip Fund) Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund – Regular Plan (Growth) HDFC Multi Cap Fund – Regular Plan (Growth). Considering my current valuation in the legacy 2010 funds alongside my 40,000 monthly SIPs, what is a realistic, risk-adjusted corpus projection for 2035 (10 years) and 2040 (15 years) assuming standard equity growth rates? Also the one time payments I made should I leave those funds or reallocate? Basically which are the food funds and which arent.
Ans: You have actually done the difficult part well — you started investing early and continued your SIPs. The main issue now is not whether to invest more, but whether 13 old holdings are still needed in the portfolio.
» One correction in the old investment amount
You mentioned approximately “Rs.50,000k each”. I assume you mean around Rs.50,000 each.
If so, the original investment across 13 funds was roughly Rs.6.5 lakh. Since these investments are from 2010, the present value could be substantially higher, but the current valuation is essential before giving a proper corpus estimate.
» What I see in the legacy portfolio
The 13 old funds have a lot of overlap.
You have exposure to:
– Large-cap equity
– Mid-cap equity
– Flexi-cap/diversified equity
– Contra/value-oriented equity
– Infrastructure and thematic funds
– Sector-oriented funds
The biggest concern is not that all these funds are bad.
The concern is having too many funds doing similar jobs.
Some of these old funds may still be good investments. But a fund that was suitable in 2010 does not automatically remain the best choice in 2026.
» What should be retained
I would broadly divide the legacy holdings into three groups.
First, diversified equity categories.
– These can continue if their long-term performance, portfolio quality and fund-management consistency remain good.
Second, thematic/sector funds.
– These need more caution.
– Infrastructure, power and theme-based funds can perform very well during favourable cycles.
– But they can also go through long periods of underperformance.
– They should not form a major part of a core retirement portfolio.
Third, overlapping large-cap funds.
– Holding several large-cap funds does not necessarily give better diversification.
– There is usually considerable overlap in the underlying companies.
Therefore, the portfolio can be simplified without reducing its equity exposure.
» Your current Rs.40,000 SIP
This is actually the stronger part of your present strategy.
You are putting Rs.10,000 each into four different equity categories.
The broad structure gives you exposure to:
– Children's long-term goal
– Large and mid-sized companies
– Flexible diversified equity
– Multi-cap equity
This is much cleaner than maintaining 13 old funds.
However, even here, I would review the overlap between the diversified categories.
More funds does not mean more diversification.
» Should you immediately sell the 2010 investments?
No.
I would not recommend selling all the old investments just because they are old.
There are three things to check first:
– Current value of each fund
– Capital gains and tax impact
– Whether each fund still has a clear role in your portfolio
Since your investments are from 2010, many of them may have substantial accumulated gains.
A wholesale switch could create an unnecessary tax liability.
Also, do not judge a fund only by its current return.
Fund consistency, downside protection, portfolio quality, category performance and fund-management changes also matter.
» What I would do with the old funds
My preference would be consolidation rather than complete disruption.
– Stop fresh investment into weak or unnecessary categories.
– Retain the better diversified holdings where they still fit your asset allocation.
– Gradually exit excessive thematic/sector exposure.
– Consolidate overlapping funds.
– Redirect future SIPs towards a smaller number of well-selected categories.
This can make the portfolio much easier to monitor.
You dont need 17 funds to build a strong long-term portfolio.
» 2035 corpus expectation
There is one important limitation.
You have not provided the current market value of each of the 13 legacy investments.
Therefore, a precise projection would be misleading.
Your Rs.40,000 monthly SIP alone can become a meaningful corpus over the next 10 years if equity markets deliver reasonable long-term returns.
The existing 2010 corpus will be an additional and potentially significant contributor.
So your 2035 corpus should be assessed using:
– Current value of all legacy investments
– Rs.40,000 monthly SIP
– Any future SIP increases
– Reasonable equity return assumptions
– Tax and costs at the time of withdrawals
I would use a range rather than promise a single number.
» 2040 corpus expectation
The 15-year horizon is even more favourable for equity investing.
Compounding becomes much more powerful over this period.
If you maintain Rs.40,000 monthly SIPs and increase them gradually with your income, your eventual corpus can be considerably higher than what a flat Rs.40,000 SIP would produce.
This is where your strategy can become really powerful.
The most important factor is not finding the perfect fund.
It is maintaining a disciplined investment rate for the next 10–15 years.
» IDCW option needs review
Almost all your old investments are in IDCW options.
For long-term wealth creation, IDCW is generally not my preferred structure.
IDCW payouts are not extra returns. The NAV gets adjusted when a distribution is made.
If you do not need periodic cash from these investments, the growth option is generally more suitable for a long-term accumulation objective.
But do not switch blindly.
First check the current value, accumulated gains and tax impact.
» A better portfolio structure
Instead of maintaining 13 legacy funds plus 4 SIP funds, I would aim for a simpler structure.
– Core diversified equity allocation
– Large and mid-cap exposure
– Multi-cap/flexi-cap exposure
– Limited mid-cap exposure where suitable
– Limited thematic exposure, only if there is a clear reason
– Separate debt/PPF/FD allocation for stability and near-term goals
This gives you a much clearer portfolio.
» One more important point
Your Children's Fund has a lock-in.
Therefore, that investment should be linked specifically to the child's goal and the required year of money.
As the goal approaches, gradually reducing equity exposure becomes important.
Do not remain 100% equity just because the investment has performed well historically.
» My overall assessment
Your investing discipline since 2010 is a big positive.
The portfolio does not look like something that needs to be completely thrown away.
It needs cleaning.
I would rate the situation like this:
– Long-term investing discipline: Strong
– Equity exposure: Good
– Number of funds: Too many
– Category overlap: High
– Thematic exposure: Needs review
– IDCW usage: Needs review
– Current SIP structure: Reasonably well organised
– Need for consolidation: High
The next step should be a fund-by-fund assessment of the 13 legacy holdings, but without looking only at past returns.
If you provide the current value of each of those 13 investments, I can classify them into “Continue”, “Hold but gradually consolidate” and “Consider exiting”, while also assessing the likely 2035 and 2040 corpus more meaningfully.
» Final Insights
You do not have a bad portfolio.
You have an old portfolio that has accumulated too many moving parts over 16 years.
That is actually a much easier problem to solve.
I would avoid unnecessary churning, protect the benefit of your old investments, control taxation, simplify overlapping holdings and continue the Rs.40,000 SIP with periodic increases.
With a 10–15 year horizon, disciplined investing and a cleaner portfolio, you have a good opportunity to build a substantial corpus.
Best Regards,
K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
AMFI-Registered MFD – ARN 4188
www.holisticinvestment.in
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ramalingamcfp/