Sir, as the government has introduced the UPS, which has caused a dilemma, i e. investment in which one of the two NPS, UPS, will be a better option, if I am planning to invest for my children, age 23, (doing his 4th year MBBS) and 18 yrs (doing his 12th standard) that can give better returns.
Ans: Investing for your children’s future is a commendable goal. With the government introducing the Universal Pension Scheme (UPS) alongside the National Pension System (NPS), it’s natural to weigh your options. The goal here is to find an investment that will not only secure their future but also maximize returns.
In this context, considering mutual funds as a primary investment vehicle may be the most effective strategy. Mutual funds can offer greater flexibility, potential returns, and the ability to meet specific financial goals for your children, aged 23 and 18.
Understanding the NPS and UPS
National Pension System (NPS)
NPS is a well-known government-backed pension scheme. It offers a mix of equity, debt, and government securities. The returns from NPS are market-linked, meaning they depend on the performance of the underlying assets. NPS also comes with tax benefits under Section 80C and 80CCD(1B) of the Income Tax Act.
Pros of NPS:
Tax Benefits: Investment in NPS offers tax deductions.
Long-Term Growth: NPS allows for disciplined retirement savings.
Partial Withdrawal: NPS permits partial withdrawals for specific needs.
Government-Backed: Being a government-backed scheme, it’s secure.
Cons of NPS:
Lock-In Period: The investment is locked until retirement, with limited withdrawal options.
Lower Equity Exposure: The maximum equity exposure in NPS is capped at 75%.
Annuity Requirement: A significant portion of the maturity amount must be used to purchase an annuity, which offers lower returns.
Universal Pension Scheme (UPS)
The recently introduced UPS is designed to provide universal coverage, catering to a broader demographic. Like NPS, it’s market-linked but with potentially more conservative investment options.
Pros of UPS:
Broader Coverage: Aimed at providing pension coverage to all.
Government Support: Backed by government initiatives.
Cons of UPS:
Lower Returns: Likely to be more conservative, with lower equity exposure.
Limited Flexibility: Similar to NPS, with a long lock-in period.
Why Mutual Funds Stand Out
Flexibility in Investment
Mutual funds offer a range of options, from equity funds to debt funds, catering to various risk appetites. For your children, considering their age and future financial needs, mutual funds provide the flexibility to adjust the investment strategy as they grow older.
Advantages:
Customizable Portfolios: You can choose funds that align with your children’s risk profile.
Liquidity: Mutual funds are more liquid, allowing easy access to funds when needed.
Diversification: Mutual funds offer diversification across different asset classes.
Higher Potential Returns
Compared to NPS and UPS, mutual funds, especially equity funds, have the potential to deliver higher returns. Over a long-term horizon, equity mutual funds can outperform other investment options due to their exposure to the stock market.
Equity Mutual Funds:
Growth-Oriented: Ideal for long-term goals like funding education or purchasing a home.
Variety: Includes large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap funds, each with its growth potential.
Debt Mutual Funds:
Stability: Provides stability with lower risk, suitable for conservative investors.
Interest Rate Dynamics: Debt funds can take advantage of changing interest rates for returns.
Why Not NPS or UPS?
Lock-In Period Constraints
Both NPS and UPS come with significant lock-in periods, restricting access to funds until retirement age. This could be a drawback if your children require funds for education, starting a business, or other life events before they reach retirement age.
Impact on Liquidity:
NPS: Limited partial withdrawal options only for specific reasons.
UPS: Likely to follow similar restrictions as NPS.
Annuity Requirement
A significant downside of NPS, and likely UPS, is the annuity purchase requirement. Upon maturity, a large portion of the corpus must be used to buy an annuity, which generally offers lower returns. This reduces the flexibility to use the accumulated wealth as per the individual’s needs.
Annuity Constraints:
Lower Returns: Annuities typically provide lower returns compared to mutual funds.
Limited Usage: The annuity locks in the amount, providing a fixed income, which may not be sufficient to meet inflation-adjusted needs.
Disadvantages of Index Funds
While index funds are popular for their low costs, they may not be the best option for achieving higher returns. Index funds merely replicate the market index, offering no potential to outperform the market.
Key Points:
No Outperformance: Index funds only match market returns.
Lack of Active Management: Index funds lack the advantage of professional fund management, which can potentially add value through stock selection.
Benefits of Regular Funds Through a Certified Financial Planner (CFP)
Investing through regular funds via a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) offers several advantages. A CFP can help you navigate the complex investment landscape and select funds that align with your goals.
Advantages:
Professional Guidance: A CFP provides expert advice tailored to your needs.
Regular Monitoring: Regular funds managed by a CFP are closely monitored and adjusted based on market conditions.
Long-Term Strategy: A CFP can help devise a long-term strategy that adapts to life changes, ensuring your investment remains aligned with your children’s needs.
Mutual Funds for Children’s Education
Equity Mutual Funds for Long-Term Goals
For your 23-year-old child, currently in the 4th year of MBBS, equity mutual funds can be an excellent choice. With a longer investment horizon, equity funds can help build a substantial corpus by the time they start their career or pursue higher studies.
Considerations:
Aggressive Growth: Focus on funds with a strong track record in equity markets.
Diversified Portfolio: Invest in a mix of large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap funds.
Balanced Mutual Funds for a Moderate Approach
For your 18-year-old child, balanced mutual funds can be a safer yet growth-oriented option. These funds invest in a mix of equity and debt, providing stability with the potential for growth.
Advantages:
Reduced Risk: Balanced funds lower the risk by including debt securities.
Steady Growth: Provides a steady growth potential suitable for education funding.
Evaluating Risk Tolerance
Understanding your children’s risk tolerance is crucial in deciding the right investment strategy.
For the 23-Year-Old:
Higher Risk Appetite: At this age, they can afford to take more risks with a greater focus on equity.
Long-Term Horizon: The longer investment horizon allows for recovery from market downturns.
For the 18-Year-Old:
Moderate Risk Appetite: A balanced approach with both equity and debt is advisable.
Shorter Horizon: As they approach higher education, a mix of stability and growth is ideal.
Final Insights
Investing in mutual funds offers flexibility, potential for higher returns, and customization based on your children’s needs. While NPS and UPS have their benefits, they come with significant limitations such as lock-in periods, lower equity exposure, and annuity requirements.
For your children, mutual funds provide the best opportunity to maximize returns, meet future financial needs, and adapt to changing circumstances.
By working with a Certified Financial Planner, you can ensure that your investments are managed professionally, with regular monitoring and adjustments, helping you stay on track towards your children’s financial goals.
Finally, prioritize a diversified approach, balancing risk and reward, to secure a bright financial future for your children.
Best Regards,
K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
Chief Financial Planner,
www.holisticinvestment.in
Question by unifiedpensionscheme.co on Aug 28, 2024Hindi
