
Hello Sir, I require some serious advice/suggestions on my below goal planning.
I am currently 37 and planning to buy a flat after 4-5 years whose approximate cost will be 75-80 Lacs.
I intend to make 30 lacs as a down-payment and rest loan.
I have the current investments monthly as below with take home salary of 1.03 lacs
1. SIP of 30k per month, total corpus 21 Lacs as on date ongoing for the last 6-7 years
2. Stocks of 4 Lacs corpus as on date (not monthly, lump sum, invested 2.40 lacs running for 5 years)
3. PPF 3k per month
4. RD of 5k per month
5. NPS of 3k per month
6. Emergency fund building 3k per month
I left with two choices.
(A) Current MF corpus can grow up to 55-60 lacs after 4-5 years which is 21 lacs as on date (assuming) with SIP of 30k monthly and 10% annual step-up.
Withdraw 25-30 lacs from that MF corpus after 4-5 years for home down payment and continue investing with balance corpus and further SIP's.
(B) Create a separate dedicated folio with MF's in goal name as home down payment, stop current 10k SIP out of 30k running and shift that 10k in the separate dedicated folio for home down payment. Balance 20k can be continued for the long term. If 5k futher investment can be done (very difficult), then in the separate folio total 15k (10k+5k additional) SIP which can generate 10-13 lacs after 5 years. Remaining 15-20 lacs can be withdrawn from current MF corpus. But I assume stopping running SIP's in old folio and opening new folio in same AMC and fresh investment will disturb compounding returns.
Now the question is - WHICH OPTION IS MORE SUITABLE OR BETTER AND WHY?
Please advise.
Ans: You’ve shown very good clarity in your financial planning. Creating a roadmap for a major goal like home purchase is a smart step. You’ve already built a solid foundation with ongoing SIPs and disciplined savings. Your dilemma between Option A and Option B is genuine. Let’s evaluate both from a 360-degree view.
Assessment of Current Financial Position
– Age: 37. You have 4–5 years to reach your home goal.
– Monthly income: Rs. 1.03 lakh (after tax).
– SIP: Rs. 30,000 monthly, total corpus Rs. 21 lakh.
– Stocks: Rs. 4 lakh corpus from Rs. 2.4 lakh invested.
– PPF: Rs. 3,000 monthly.
– RD: Rs. 5,000 monthly.
– NPS: Rs. 3,000 monthly.
– Emergency fund: Rs. 3,000 monthly.
You are investing nearly 45% of your take-home salary. This reflects good financial discipline. Your portfolio is diversified across equity, debt, and retirement instruments.
Evaluation of Goal and Timeline
– Goal: Home purchase after 4–5 years.
– Approximate cost: Rs. 75–80 lakh.
– Down payment plan: Rs. 30 lakh.
– Balance through home loan.
Since your time horizon is medium-term (4–5 years), asset allocation needs some rethinking. Equity may not suit 100% of this horizon.
Understanding Option A
– Continue current SIP of Rs. 30,000.
– Allow corpus to grow from Rs. 21 lakh to approx. Rs. 55–60 lakh.
– Withdraw Rs. 25–30 lakh after 5 years for home down payment.
– Continue SIPs and retain balance for long-term wealth creation.
Pros of Option A
– Simplicity. No change in investment pattern.
– Compounding remains uninterrupted in original folios.
– All gains consolidated under one portfolio.
– Lesser paperwork. Easy tracking.
– Suitable if you are confident in managing portfolio mentally for multiple goals.
Cons of Option A
– No earmarked folio for home goal.
– Emotional detachment may be difficult.
– Temptation to dip into entire corpus at once.
– Risk of equity volatility close to goal year.
– No tactical rebalancing as goal nears.
Understanding Option B
– Shift Rs. 10,000 of SIP to a new folio for home down payment.
– Try to increase by Rs. 5,000 more to make it Rs. 15,000 monthly.
– Expected corpus in 5 years from this new SIP: Rs. 10–13 lakh.
– Withdraw balance Rs. 15–20 lakh from existing corpus.
– Retain Rs. 20,000 SIP for long-term corpus.
Pros of Option B
– Clear mental demarcation of goals.
– Dedicated folio for house funding improves discipline.
– Easier to manage asset allocation specific to goal.
– Flexibility to invest conservatively as goal nears.
– Reduces risk of overexposing entire corpus to short-term goal.
Cons of Option B
– Reduces current SIP in wealth-building folio.
– New folio restarts compounding afresh.
– Lower corpus growth due to shorter SIP period.
– Emotional discomfort of stopping old SIPs.
Your Concern About Disturbing Compounding
This is a valid thought. However, compounding is not lost. You are just creating a new stream. Your past investment continues to compound. You are only pausing one SIP and redirecting it to a new folio. That doesn't kill compounding. It simply builds two separate ladders instead of one.
Your concern shows your long-term commitment. That’s admirable.
Suitability Based on Risk, Behaviour, and Psychology
If you are emotionally strong and can keep your hands off the corpus, Option A works.
If you need visual goal-segregation and behavioural discipline, Option B is safer.
If your job is stable and income expected to grow, Option B gives better flexibility.
If cashflow is tight, Option A avoids additional mental burden.
Ideal Strategy (Hybrid of A and B)
You don’t have to pick A or B 100%. A hybrid plan suits better.
– Keep Rs. 20,000 SIP in original folio for long term.
– Redirect Rs. 10,000 to a new goal folio.
– Increase it to Rs. 12,000–13,000 when bonuses or increments come.
– This helps build Rs. 10–12 lakh in 5 years in new folio.
– You can withdraw remaining from your main folio.
– One year before purchase, shift goal folio to conservative hybrid or short-duration debt funds.
– This reduces market risk near goal year.
Important Point: Asset Allocation As Goal Nears
Equity is not ideal for goals due within 3 years. You should gradually reduce equity exposure in your home goal folio:
– Till 3 years: keep 100% equity.
– 2 years: shift 30–50% to conservative hybrid.
– Final year: move majority to liquid or short-term debt.
This ensures corpus safety. Otherwise, market fall in goal year can affect down payment capacity.
Disadvantage of Direct Mutual Funds
Since you haven’t asked specifically, a gentle reminder:
– Avoid direct plans if you lack professional knowledge.
– Regular funds via an MFD with CFP qualification bring expert support.
– Regular plans include portfolio rebalancing, goal review, emotional support during market downturn.
– In goal-oriented planning, advisor intervention helps reduce costly mistakes.
– The cost difference is marginal compared to the value of guidance and discipline.
Additional Suggestions for Smooth Execution
– Don’t disturb your emergency fund. Continue Rs. 3,000 monthly.
– Ensure 6–8 months’ expenses are covered.
– Don’t compromise PPF and NPS. These are long-term retirement tools.
– Review stock portfolio. Avoid overlap with mutual funds.
– Don’t withdraw stock corpus for home down payment unless necessary.
Tax Planning for Mutual Fund Withdrawals
– For equity mutual funds, STCG is taxed at 20%.
– LTCG above Rs. 1.25 lakh is taxed at 12.5%.
– Plan redemptions across financial years to reduce tax outgo.
– Avoid bulk withdrawal in one go. Spread over 2 financial years if possible.
– Keep proof of SIP dates to calculate exact taxation.
Loan Planning and Credit Discipline
– Keep credit score high. Don’t default on any dues.
– Avoid unnecessary loans before home loan application.
– Check your home loan eligibility beforehand.
– Go for a tenure you can manage. Don’t stretch to 25–30 years.
– Maintain your MF corpus to help with pre-closure later.
Finally
– You are on the right track. Both options have merit.
– Option B gives discipline. Option A gives compounding.
– Hybrid method is most effective.
– Continue SIPs, segregate goals, de-risk near target year.
– Track portfolio quarterly. Review annually.
– Seek guidance from a CFP if needed for fund review.
– With your discipline and plan, owning a home is achievable with peace.
Best Regards,
K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
Chief Financial Planner,
www.holisticinvestment.in
https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment