Home > Money > Question
Need Expert Advice?Our Gurus Can Help
Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |8459 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on May 15, 2025

Ramalingam Kalirajan has over 23 years of experience in mutual funds and financial planning.
He has an MBA in finance from the University of Madras and is a certified financial planner.
He is the director and chief financial planner at Holistic Investment, a Chennai-based firm that offers financial planning and wealth management advice.... more
Jignesh Question by Jignesh on Apr 24, 2025
Money

Hello Sir, I have a query regarding which is right approach of mentioned two options -I want generate quarterly payout of 15k from a lumpsum investment of 5.5 lac. This is for paying school fees. I'm confused if to invest this lumpsum in a Balanced advanced fund and set up an SWP of 15k quarterly (OR) to put it in a non-cumulative FD that pays out quarterly interest. I'm okay to stay invested for 6 years. Although FD provides the capital preservation but lags in capital appreciation where as BAF has the risk but with time horizon of 6 years, it shall mitigate risk & most importantly returns will still be favourable due to equity component as kicker in BAF Mf's. Your thoughts please... Thank you

Ans: You wish to get Rs. 15,000 quarterly payout for your child’s school fees.

You have Rs. 5.5 lakhs in lump sum.

You are considering two options — quarterly payout through SWP in a Balanced Advantage Fund or a non-cumulative Fixed Deposit.

Your investment horizon is 6 years. That gives decent time.

You want capital safety but also better growth. Well analysed thinking from your side.

You are open to taking some risk, which is important for longer-term results.

Let Us Assess the Fixed Deposit Option

FD gives assured interest. That’s good for guaranteed cash flows.

There is no risk of capital loss if held to maturity. That gives peace of mind.

The interest payout every quarter is fixed. You can plan expenses well.

But returns are low after tax. Especially if you are in a high tax bracket.

FD interest is fully taxable as per your slab. That’s a key drawback.

FD returns are flat. So, over 6 years, your capital will not grow.

Inflation reduces real return. That erodes value of money slowly.

You are only withdrawing interest. So, principal stays idle without growing.

Even reinvested interest would earn low return. No scope for capital appreciation.

Now Let Us Evaluate Balanced Advantage Mutual Fund with SWP

These funds shift between equity and debt. They try to reduce downside in markets.

They offer better long-term returns than FD due to equity exposure.

They suit 5–7 year timeframes if you can hold through market cycles.

You can set up SWP of Rs. 15,000 every 3 months. That’s Rs. 60,000 annually.

Over 6 years, you may withdraw Rs. 3.6 lakhs. And capital can still grow.

If fund returns stay healthy, you may have more than Rs. 5.5 lakhs after 6 years.

Tax is lower on capital gains. LTCG up to Rs. 1.25 lakhs per year is tax-free.

Gains above that are taxed at 12.5%, which is much better than FD tax.

SWP is treated as capital redemption. So, only gains part gets taxed.

Therefore, this method gives tax-efficient income. That improves your post-tax return.

Let Us Compare Both Head-To-Head

FD: Low return, high tax, stable income, no capital growth.

BAF+SWP: Moderate return, lower tax, variable income, capital appreciation possible.

FD may be safer. But too safe may not meet your long-term needs.

BAF is not risk-free. But 6 years gives enough time for risk to reduce.

With discipline and patience, BAF can deliver better results than FD.

Fixed Deposit income will stay flat. But school fees will rise over time.

BAF capital may grow, allowing higher SWP in future. That helps in rising fees.

So, with proper SWP planning, you get both income and capital protection.

How to Make SWP Work Better for You

Choose dividend re-investment option, and use only SWP for income.

Withdraw only 3-4% of corpus per year to avoid depleting it.

Review performance every year with your Certified Financial Planner.

Reinvest part of gains back into same fund. That helps compound returns.

Keep emergency funds separately in FD or liquid fund. Do not disturb this corpus.

Important Risk Factors to Remember

Mutual fund returns are not guaranteed. Markets fluctuate.

There may be periods of poor returns. But recovery happens in long term.

You should be emotionally ready to handle short-term volatility.

Equity portion can sometimes fall. But long-term trend is upward.

Choose a regular plan and route it through MFD with CFP support.

Avoid direct plans. They do not give ongoing guidance or active monitoring.

Why You Should Avoid Direct Mutual Funds

Direct funds offer no advisor support. You must do everything yourself.

That includes selection, portfolio review, tax planning, rebalancing.

Many investors end up with wrong choices due to lack of guidance.

Certified Financial Planners bring strategy, experience, and discipline.

Regular plans have a small cost. But they offer lifelong handholding.

For goals like school fees, peace of mind matters more than 0.5% savings.

Emotional support during market falls is also priceless.

Final Insights

You are thinking long term. That is the right mindset.

You want regular income and capital growth. BAF+SWP is better suited.

FD may feel safe. But inflation and taxes make it less efficient.

With 6-year view, Balanced Advantage Fund gives more growth chance.

Do SWP carefully. Avoid high withdrawals in early years.

Review with your Certified Financial Planner every year. Make changes if needed.

Stay invested. Be patient. Do not panic in market dips.

Protect your child’s education fund with a right mix of strategy and guidance.

Keep emotions aside. Let long-term thinking guide you.

Use fund growth smartly. Withdraw only what is needed. Let rest grow.

A hybrid plan like BAF offers flexibility and balance. That suits your goal well.

Continue school fee payments through SWP. Watch your capital grow slowly.

After 6 years, you may have money left over, not just spent. That is success.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,

Chief Financial Planner,

www.holisticinvestment.in
https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment
DISCLAIMER: The content of this post by the expert is the personal view of the rediffGURU. Users are advised to pursue the information provided by the rediffGURU only as a source of information to be as a point of reference and to rely on their own judgement when making a decision.
Money

You may like to see similar questions and answers below

Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |8459 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on Mar 13, 2025

Asked by Anonymous - Mar 11, 2025Hindi
Listen
Money
Hello sir, I have about 28 lakhs invested in different MF. Now i want a SWP of 35000 per month from that total fund. Looking at the current market situation I was either thinking if dividing the fund between debt 30% and equity 70%. But instead of investing a lumpsum amounts will it make more sense to park all my funds in a dynamic debt fund and then every month do SIP of maybe one lakh each to equity fund or balanced fund. Also i would like to know what difference will it make in my investment returns between sip and lumpsum except ofcourse averageing the market volatility in case of SIP and getting more UNITS if done lumpsum.
Ans: You have Rs 28 lakh invested in mutual funds and want to withdraw Rs 35,000 per month through a Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP). You are considering whether to invest the corpus as a lump sum in a 70% equity – 30% debt allocation or to park the full amount in a debt fund and do an SIP of Rs 1 lakh per month into equity.

Your goal should be to generate stable withdrawals while preserving your capital and ensuring growth. Below is a structured approach to managing your funds wisely.

Understanding SWP and Its Impact on Your Corpus
SWP is a cash flow strategy, allowing regular withdrawals while the remaining corpus continues to grow.

The key challenge is to balance withdrawals and growth so that the corpus does not deplete too soon.

Investing in a mix of debt and equity will ensure stability while benefiting from market growth.

Option 1: Investing 70% in Equity and 30% in Debt
This allocation is suitable for long-term growth. Equity provides growth, while debt ensures stability.

A balanced portfolio helps manage volatility and ensures a steady SWP.

The downside is that a lump sum investment in equity exposes you to market fluctuations.

If the market falls after investing, the SWP may lead to selling equity at a lower value, reducing corpus longevity.

Option 2: Parking in a Debt Fund and Doing Monthly SIPs
This reduces market timing risk by investing gradually.

Debt funds provide low but steady returns, protecting the corpus while equity exposure increases.

SIPs spread the risk over time, ensuring better price averaging.

The downside is that debt funds provide lower returns, which may impact the final corpus.

SIP vs Lump Sum: Key Differences
SIP helps in market averaging, reducing the impact of volatility.

Lump sum investment can generate higher returns if the market performs well.

SIP is better for those worried about market crashes, while lump sum works well for long-term investors willing to take higher risks.

Best Strategy for You
A hybrid approach will work best:

Step 1: Park Rs 28 lakh in a low-duration or dynamic debt fund.

Step 2: Start an SIP of Rs 1 lakh per month into equity for 24–28 months.

Step 3: Withdraw Rs 35,000 per month from the debt fund until equity allocation builds up.

Step 4: After 2–3 years, rebalance to maintain a 60% equity – 40% debt allocation for stability.

Tax Implications of SWP
Withdrawals from equity funds held for over 1 year attract 12.5% tax on LTCG above Rs 1.25 lakh.

Withdrawals before 1 year attract 20% STCG tax.

Withdrawals from debt funds are taxed as per your income tax slab.

Final Insights
A mix of debt and equity will ensure growth and stability in your SWP plan.

Parking the corpus in a debt fund first and then gradually shifting to equity is a safer approach.

Rebalancing every 2–3 years will help manage risk and sustain withdrawals.

Keep track of taxation to optimise post-tax returns.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP

Chief Financial Planner

www.holisticinvestment.in
https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment

..Read more

Janak

Janak Patel  |33 Answers  |Ask -

MF, PF Expert - Answered on Apr 25, 2025

Money
Hello Sir, I have a query regarding which is right approach of mentioned two options -I want generate quarterly payout of 15k from a lumpsum investment of 5.5 lac. This is for paying school fees. I'm confused if to invest tthis lumpsum in a Balanced advanced fund and set up an SWP of 15k quarterly (OR) to put it in a non-cumulative FD that pays out quarterly interest. I'm okay to stay invested for 6 years. Although FD provides the capital preservation but lags in capital appreciation where as BAF has the risk but with time horizon of 6 years, it shall mitigate risk & most importantly returns will still be favourable due to equity component as kicker in BAF Mf's. Your thoughts please... Thank you
Ans: Hi Jignesh,

A good question which I get asked by many parents for a similar requirement.
Both options as you have pointed out have their out pros and cons. The Risk/Return equation is always going to weigh on the decision making.

At 6~7% return on an FD, we are considering approx. 10 lakhs amount for investment and its not a small amount by any means.

The Balanced Advantage Fund (BAF) has a debt component and that provides a certain level of stability/downside protection to the investment.

Usually we always associate short term requirements with safety and liquidity requirements and longer term investments with growth. Having said that, this cannot and should not be taken as just 1 and only individual investment for a person.
Because if we do that then, logic suggests a conservative approach with FDs as its the child school fees and we cannot default in its payment.

I will give you the options I think will help you make the decision.
1. Are you of a very conservative person when it comes to taking risk with your money ?
If you think you can sleep peacefully knowing that the school fees will be paid no matter what as its kept in a safe and liquid investment like FD then please stay with FD.
This is also a scenario for individuals who do not have a steady stream of income and many factors influence their income source or individual who have very limited investments.

2. Do you have other investments which can supplement any market volatility on this investment ?
If you think that you have other investments which can supplement the school fees if the market becomes volatile and you understand that in the long term the equity portion of the investment is what you want to provide that extra return. This understanding and acceptance of risk provides you with assurance that you can stay committed to your approach, then and only then proceed with equity linked investment.
This scenario doesn't reflect you as being risky with your money, but rather an approach where you embrace the volatility and have confidence to manage your money for the long term. So a BAF is a good approach.

So in summary your own risk taking ability and your investment portfolio should help you plan the right approach. At the end of the day its what will give you assurance for the future that matters the most.

Thanks & Regards
Janak Patel
Certified Financial Planner.

..Read more

Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |8459 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on May 15, 2025

Asked by Anonymous - Apr 24, 2025
Money
Hello Jinal, I have a query regarding which is right approach of mentioned two options -I want generate quarterly payout of 15k from a lumpsum investment of 5.5 lac. This is for paying school fees. I'm confused if to invest this lumpsum in a Balanced advanced fund and set up an SWP of 15k quarterly (OR) to put it in a non-cumulative FD that pays out quarterly interest. I'm okay to stay invested for 6 years. Although FD provides the capital preservation but lags in capital appreciation where as BAF has the risk but with time horizon of 6 years, it shall mitigate risk & most importantly returns will still be favourable due to equity component as kicker in BAF Mf's. Your thoughts please... Thank you
Ans: You want to generate Rs. 15,000 quarterly from a Rs. 5.5 lakh investment over 6 years to fund school fees. You’re considering two options—Balanced Advantage Fund (BAF) with SWP or Non-Cumulative Fixed Deposit (FD) with quarterly interest.

Let’s assess both approaches from a 360-degree personal finance lens.

Understanding the Core Objective
Your main goal is to receive Rs. 15,000 every quarter, reliably.

The investment horizon is 6 years, which is medium-term.

You are open to limited risk, but also want better growth than FD.

Capital preservation and growth—both are key goals.

Key Features of Quarterly FD Option
FDs offer guaranteed interest payouts every quarter.

Capital stays safe from market risks.

FD interest is taxed as per your income slab. So, post-tax return may be low.

It provides zero growth in capital. After 6 years, capital remains Rs. 5.5 lakh.

Current FD rates for 5–6 years are in the 6.5% to 7.25% range (subject to change).

Liquidity is low. Early withdrawal has penalties and breaks the flow.

Key Features of Balanced Advantage Fund (BAF) with SWP
BAFs are hybrid mutual funds. They manage mix of equity and debt.

They reduce equity exposure during high market levels. This lowers risk.

At low market levels, they increase equity. This adds return potential.

You can set SWP of Rs. 15,000 every quarter, giving regular cash flow.

Over 6 years, the fund also aims to grow your capital.

You are not only preserving capital, but trying to grow it slowly.

Your Understanding of BAF is Right
You mentioned equity kicker in BAF. Yes, it can help over 6 years.

Markets may go up and down, but hybrid approach smoothens volatility.

The longer you stay, the better BAFs can manage risk and return.

Tax Comparison – FD vs BAF
FD interest is taxed fully as per your slab. There’s no indexation or benefits.

For BAF, SWP is partly capital and partly gains. Tax applies only to gains.

STCG (less than 1 year) is taxed at 20%.

LTCG (above 1 year) is tax-free up to Rs. 1.25 lakh per year.

Above that, LTCG taxed at 12.5%. Still better than slab rates in most cases.

This makes BAF more tax efficient for many investors.

Assessing Risk and Return Over 6 Years
FD return is fixed and certain, but limited to interest rate.

In 6 years, FD may not beat inflation after tax.

BAF carries some market risk. But over 6 years, risk reduces.

BAF offers chance to grow your capital while giving regular income.

Even if SWP withdraws a part of capital, growth may still preserve value.

Cash Flow Stability for School Fees
FD gives fixed interest. You know exact income every quarter.

BAF SWP gives similar predictable payout, but with more flexibility.

You can change the SWP amount any time. You can also stop or increase.

That flexibility helps if your needs or markets change.

Liquidity, Flexibility and Control
FD locks your money. Premature exit reduces return.

BAF is fully liquid. You can redeem or adjust any time.

SWP in BAF gives you greater control over your money.

You are not bound by interest cycle or maturity terms.

Mental Comfort and Emotional Fit
FD gives peace of mind to risk-averse investors.

If fear of market loss is very high, FD feels safer.

But your thinking shows you are open-minded and practical.

You understand time horizon matters in risk management. That’s a strong point.

Should You Choose FD or Balanced Advantage Fund?
Let us now weigh the two options with key points:

Choose FD If:
You want absolute safety and cannot accept any capital fluctuation.

Your tax slab is low, so post-tax FD return is still okay.

You are not concerned about capital growth after 6 years.

You want no link to markets, even if return is lower.

Choose BAF with SWP If:
You want quarterly income + capital growth.

You are ready to accept minor short-term ups and downs.

You want higher post-tax returns over 6 years.

You value liquidity, flexibility, and future adaptability.

Suggested Strategy for More Balance
You can also consider combining both:

Put Rs. 3.5 lakh in BAF, set up SWP for Rs. 15,000 quarterly.

Keep Rs. 2 lakh in FD, for comfort and emergency use.

This gives you better returns and peace of mind.

If needed, the FD can also fund any shortfall from SWP.

Over time, you’ll develop confidence in mutual fund-based income plans.

Long-Term Behavioural Benefits
This is also a good time to build investment experience with BAF + SWP.

It helps you prepare for future retirement planning using same structure.

You’ll understand volatility, tax benefits, and fund performance better.

Why You Should Avoid Direct MF Plans
Direct plans do not offer personal guidance or periodic portfolio checks.

You miss out on ongoing advisory support.

Investing through an MFD with CFP credential ensures structured planning.

You get regular review, goal tracking, and adjustments as needed.

Also, in SWP, you need timely rebalancing. That guidance comes only in regular plans.

Disadvantages of Index Funds for SWP
Index funds blindly follow market movements.

They cannot shift between equity and debt as per market cycle.

During falls, index funds lose more. Recovery takes time.

SWP from index funds in such periods can erode capital fast.

BAFs manage this better with dynamic asset allocation.

Actively managed hybrid funds with skilled fund managers are more stable.

How to Implement This in Practical Steps
Start with Rs. 5.5 lakh in a Balanced Advantage Fund through MFD.

Choose regular plan to get CFP-guided service and tracking.

Set up quarterly SWP of Rs. 15,000, starting after 1 month.

Review every 6 months with your MFD.

Keep separate small contingency fund for any shortfall or delay.

Keep This in Mind While Starting
First few quarters may see capital dips if market is volatile.

But do not panic. BAFs balance risk automatically over time.

After 2-3 years, growth usually covers earlier volatility.

Always keep a small buffer amount aside outside of MF.

Finally
Your plan is well-thought and practical.

Balanced Advantage Fund suits your 6-year goal and quarterly payout.

You get capital growth, steady income, and better tax efficiency.

FD is safer but gives lower overall benefit.

Your confidence in equity as a kicker is right and realistic.

Choose SWP in BAF via regular plan with an MFD having CFP qualification.

It will help you balance return, risk, and tax effectively.

Best Regards,
K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
Chief Financial Planner,
www.holisticinvestment.in
https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment

..Read more

Latest Questions
Dr Dipankar

Dr Dipankar Dutta  |1254 Answers  |Ask -

Tech Careers and Skill Development Expert - Answered on May 16, 2025

DISCLAIMER: The content of this post by the expert is the personal view of the rediffGURU. Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related document carefully before investing. The securities quoted are for illustration only and are not recommendatory. Users are advised to pursue the information provided by the rediffGURU only as a source of information and as a point of reference and to rely on their own judgement when making a decision. RediffGURUS is an intermediary as per India's Information Technology Act.

Close  

You haven't logged in yet. To ask a question, Please Log in below
Login

A verification OTP will be sent to this
Mobile Number / Email

Enter OTP
A 6 digit code has been sent to

Resend OTP in120seconds

Dear User, You have not registered yet. Please register by filling the fields below to get expert answers from our Gurus
Sign up

By signing up, you agree to our
Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Already have an account?

Enter OTP
A 6 digit code has been sent to Mobile

Resend OTP in120seconds

x