Home > Money > Question
Need Expert Advice?Our Gurus Can Help
Dev

Dev Ashish  | Answer  |Ask -

MF Expert, Financial Planner - Answered on Jul 18, 2023

Dev Ashish is a fee-only SEBI-registered investment advisor with over 15 years of active experience in the stock market. In 2011, he founded StableInvestor, a platform for personal finance and financial planning.
He provides professional fee-only investment advisory services to small and high networth individuals in order to help them achieve their financial goals.
Ashish's views are regularly published in national business publications. He has an MBA degree from NMIMS, Mumbai and also holds an engineering degree.... more
Nitiksha Question by Nitiksha on Jun 29, 2023Hindi
Listen
Money

Should High or Low NAV of a scheme impact your Investment Decision?

Ans: First, low NAV doesn’t mean that it’s a cheaper fund. Second, NO, cheap or low NAV is not better in mutual funds. In reality, the NAV of a fund is irrelevant and ideally, it shouldn’t even be considered when making an investment decision regarding investing in mutual funds.

Let me explain in simple terms why low NAV doesn’t matter at all.

Suppose two friends invest in 2 different mutual fund schemes having identical portfolios. But their NAVs are different. One was launched several years ago and hence, has a higher NAV of Rs 200. While the other is a relatively new fund with a NAV of Rs 20 only. But both funds have exactly the same portfolio of stocks they invest in.

Both friends invest Rs 1 lakh. The older fund investor gets 500 units at a NAV of Rs 200 per unit. While the new fund investor gets 5000 units at NAV of Rs 20 per unit. So it is true that lower NAV would give you more units while higher NAV would give you a lesser number of units.

Now let’s say that both funds rise by the same 20%. Since the portfolio is the same, the fund appreciation will be the same as well.

A 20% rise in the older fund will increase its NAV from Rs 200 to Rs 240. While that of the newer fund will increase from Rs 20 to Rs 24. At the fact of it, you might say that the older fund has risen by Rs 40 while the newer one has risen by Rs 4 only. But that is not the right way to look at it. You need to compare the value of your investment.

So older fund investor having 500 units (purchased at Rs 200 per unit) will see their investment increase from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.2 lakh due to the rise in NAV from Rs 200 to Rs 240.

Not surprisingly, the new fund investor having 5000 units (purchased at Rs 20 per unit) will also see his investment increase from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.2 lakh due to the rise in NAV from Rs 20 to Rs 24.

So inspite of the different number of units held due to different investment NAVs, the eventual value of the investment is the same. This is the reason that concept of low NAV or high NAV is irrelevant. What only matters is the future % increase in NAV. That’s it. Mutual fund schemes should not be judged on their NAVs but on their performance.

This confusion about low NAV vs high NAV arises because many investors make the mistake of looking at the fund’s NAV like stock prices. But that is not the case. Both are very different animals.

Low NAV doesn’t mean a cheaper fund. High NAV doesn’t mean an expensive fund.
DISCLAIMER: The content of this post by the expert is the personal view of the rediffGURU. Users are advised to pursue the information provided by the rediffGURU only as a source of information to be as a point of reference and to rely on their own judgement when making a decision.
Money

You may like to see similar questions and answers below

Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |11161 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on Sep 12, 2024

Asked by Anonymous - Sep 12, 2024Hindi
Listen
Money
Should high or low NAV of a scheme impact your investment decision? Why, if yes and why, if no?
Ans: Before diving into whether a high or low NAV (Net Asset Value) should influence your investment decision, let's clarify what NAV actually represents. NAV refers to the per-unit price of a mutual fund, which is calculated as the total value of all assets in the fund minus liabilities, divided by the number of units outstanding. It reflects the price at which investors can buy or sell units of a mutual fund.

Many investors believe that a lower NAV means the fund is cheaper or a better investment, while a higher NAV implies that the fund is expensive. However, this understanding is not accurate. NAV should not be the deciding factor when choosing a mutual fund. Here’s why.

Why NAV Should Not Impact Your Investment Decision
1. NAV Reflects Past Performance, Not Future Returns

NAV primarily reflects the value of a mutual fund’s existing investments. A high NAV usually indicates that the fund has performed well in the past. However, past performance does not guarantee future returns. A fund with a lower NAV might just be newer or have experienced market volatility, but that doesn’t necessarily make it a better buy.

In mutual fund investing, what matters more is how well the fund’s assets are managed and whether the fund aligns with your financial goals and risk appetite. The NAV is just a number that reflects the current value of the fund, not its potential for future growth.

2. NAV Does Not Indicate Fund’s Market Value

Unlike stocks, where a lower price may indicate a bargain, a low NAV in mutual funds does not mean the fund is undervalued. Similarly, a higher NAV does not mean the fund is overpriced. The NAV is simply a reflection of the current per-unit price based on the fund’s portfolio. Whether the NAV is Rs 10 or Rs 100, it doesn't affect the proportionate share of assets you hold in the fund.

3. The Fund’s Track Record and Strategy Matter More

When choosing a mutual fund, you should focus more on:

The fund’s performance over time relative to its benchmark.

The experience and strategy of the fund manager in handling the fund’s assets.

The fund’s investment philosophy, whether it is aligned with your risk profile and investment goals.

A fund with a high NAV could have a consistent history of good returns, but that doesn’t mean a low NAV fund won’t catch up or outperform in the future.

4. Fund Returns Are Proportional to Your Investment

The returns you earn from a mutual fund are a percentage of your invested amount. Whether you invest Rs 10,000 in a fund with a high NAV of Rs 200 or a low NAV of Rs 20, you are buying a proportional share of the fund’s total assets. The number of units you get may differ, but the actual investment remains the same, and so does the potential for returns, assuming both funds perform equally well.

When Should NAV Matter?
1. For Dividend and Growth Options

In certain scenarios, NAV can play a role when comparing dividend and growth options within the same mutual fund. In the dividend option, NAV reduces after a payout, which might give an impression that your wealth has decreased. However, the reduction is due to the payout, not a loss in the fund’s value.

For growth options, where no payouts are made, the NAV reflects the compounding effect over time, so you should focus on the overall returns rather than short-term fluctuations in NAV.

2. For Tax-Saving Mutual Funds (ELSS)

In tax-saving mutual funds, also known as Equity Linked Savings Schemes (ELSS), investors sometimes prefer to invest when the NAV is lower, thinking they are getting a bargain. But again, this mindset is misplaced. What matters in ELSS funds is the long-term growth potential and tax benefits, not the immediate NAV.

Final Insights
When investing in mutual funds, NAV is not a meaningful indicator of the fund’s future performance or suitability. Whether a fund has a high or low NAV should not be the primary factor in your decision-making process. Instead, focus on:

Fund consistency in performance over different time periods.

Alignment of the fund’s risk profile with your investment goals.

The track record and strategy of the fund manager.

By focusing on these key factors, you can make more informed decisions that lead to long-term financial success, rather than getting distracted by the fund’s NAV.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
Chief Financial Planner,
www.holisticinvestment.in

..Read more

Latest Questions
Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |11161 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on May 04, 2026

Money
I am 61 self Disciplined minimalist. I am now in SWP segment. 4% SWP and step up SWP are all okay and understandable but much worried on flip side which am often not thinking much. Considering next 30 years block 1. Inflation may also shoot up from 6% to 15% 2. Normally market crash once in 10 years assuming 30% crash 3. Recovery phase may take slow say 5 to 7 years 4. War natural calamities etc influence market once in 7 year 5.expected return may hit bottom from 10% With all this sequential risk, the worry is will my corpus empty earlier should I be with half starving and my SWP is good only in paper or any corrections needs to be done? Because when age grows, expenses can't be reduced, only rebalance the ratio from travel to utility like that So please guide me will my SWP corpus empty earlier, and should I do now as preparedness
Ans: Your concern is very valid and very mature. Most people focus only on returns, but you are thinking about risks like inflation, crashes, and long recovery. This is exactly what protects a retirement plan.

» The Real Risk – Sequence of Returns
Your worry is not wrong.

If market falls early in retirement and you keep withdrawing
Then recovery is slow
Corpus can reduce faster than expected

This is called sequence risk
And yes, this can impact SWP sustainability

But this can be managed with structure, not by stopping SWP

» Inflation Risk – Bigger Than Market Risk

If inflation moves from 6% to even 10–12%, pressure increases
Expenses rise continuously, but corpus may not match

Reality:

Inflation risk is permanent
Market crash is temporary

So your plan must protect against inflation first

» Is 4% SWP Safe?

4% is generally considered reasonable
But not “guaranteed safe” in all conditions

In your scenario (high inflation + poor returns):

4% may become slightly aggressive

Better approach:

Keep flexibility between 3.5% to 4%
Reduce withdrawal slightly during bad market years

» Biggest Protection – Bucket Strategy
This is the most important correction

Divide your corpus into 3 buckets:

Bucket 1 (0–5 years expenses)
Keep in safe instruments (liquid / low risk)
This funds your SWP
Bucket 2 (5–10 years)
Hybrid or balanced funds
Bucket 3 (10+ years)
Equity funds for growth

How this helps:

During crash, you do not touch equity
You spend from Bucket 1
Equity gets time to recover

This directly reduces sequence risk

» Dynamic SWP – Very Important Adjustment
Instead of fixed thinking:

In good years → continue or increase SWP
In bad years → pause increase or reduce slightly

Even a small 5–10% temporary cut:

Greatly increases corpus life

This is practical, not theoretical

» Rebalancing Discipline

Once a year, review allocation
When equity grows → shift some to safe bucket
This “locks gains”

This creates a natural buffer for future crashes

» Extreme Scenario Planning (Your Concern)
You mentioned:

30% crash
5–7 year recovery
High inflation

In such case:

Bucket 1 should cover at least 5–7 years expenses
This is your survival shield

If this is in place:

You will not be forced to sell at loss
Corpus will not empty early

» Expense Behaviour – Practical Reality
You are right:

Expenses don’t reduce easily with age
They only shift (travel → medical, lifestyle → essentials)

So plan should:

Keep medical buffer separately
Not depend on cutting expenses

» Mental Model Shift
Do not think:
“Will my corpus finish?”

Think:
“How do I protect withdrawals during bad phases?”

Because:

Markets recover
But wrong withdrawals during crash cause damage

» Final Adjustments You Should Do Now

Maintain 5–7 years expenses in safe bucket
Keep equity allocation for long-term growth
Use flexible SWP (not rigid)
Rebalance yearly
Be ready to reduce withdrawal slightly in extreme conditions

» Finally

Your fear is not overthinking, it is intelligent thinking
SWP does not fail because of market alone
It fails due to poor withdrawal strategy during bad years

If you structure your buckets and keep flexibility, your corpus can comfortably last 30 years and more without “half starving” situations.

You are already ahead because you are asking the right question at the right time.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,

Chief Financial Planner,

www.holisticinvestment.in

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ramalingamcfp/

...Read more

DISCLAIMER: The content of this post by the expert is the personal view of the rediffGURU. Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related document carefully before investing. The securities quoted are for illustration only and are not recommendatory. Users are advised to pursue the information provided by the rediffGURU only as a source of information and as a point of reference and to rely on their own judgement when making a decision. RediffGURUS is an intermediary as per India's Information Technology Act.

Close  

You haven't logged in yet. To ask a question, Please Log in below
Login

A verification OTP will be sent to this
Mobile Number / Email

Enter OTP
A 6 digit code has been sent to

Resend OTP in120seconds

Dear User, You have not registered yet. Please register by filling the fields below to get expert answers from our Gurus
Sign up

By signing up, you agree to our
Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Already have an account?

Enter OTP
A 6 digit code has been sent to Mobile

Resend OTP in120seconds

x