Hi Sir, i had ITR dues for the year 17-18. It was 15K then, now it has become 60K. The 15K tax came because of savings interest i got in 2017. There was TDS deduction at the bank side for the interest given. At that time i used to file my return myself, and made this mistake. I had to pay 10 % tax but it was already deducted by bank. How do I solve this problem. I am frustrated on the notice issued by the IT team.

I am a salaried employee and worked for a Pvt company. I left the Job is Nov'19 previous year and took a sabbatical for 6 months for my family.  On my last day, I submitted all my investment proofs and as per my calculations, the final TDS should have been NIL and I should have been eligible for refund of TDS which was deducted in earlier months. When I received Form-16 for FY1920 on the end of Oct'20, I found they had missed out considering my deduction us/24 (b). Interest on housing Loan was missing and due to which my refund amount was reduced. When I checked with Company, they refused to consider it now and asked me to consider it while filing my ITR. Please let me know, can I consider the same while filing my ITR and how do I get it considered to save on my tax return?

Dear Mr Tanna, Before soliciting your sincere opinion I must first congratulate and compliment you for the benevolent job being done to alleviate the problems being faced by the solo taxpayers from the pounce of the IT Office. I would request you to go through my problem which is very much exhaustive and moreover disheartening for the busy people like you. I am a retd employee from LIC in the FY 2020/21. In FY 2021/22 I had received arrears of salary along with commutation of pension and leave encashment. The employer while finalizing the IT for 2021/22 had deducted IT giving the exemption for comm pension, 80CC and 80D without the benefit under sec 89. While filing IT I could see the effect of AIS. Without any further deduction except under 80 TTB, I tried to confirm the Total Taxable Income as per 26AS/AIS. The self-assessed tax was to be paid on three dates because of the ATM limit etc. The last payment which was on 28th July, could not be successful and was debited on 29th as a result I could not add the CIN No etc., on the Add box of tax payment. Since the total amount of tax was paid before the last date i.e 31st I did submit a short paid ITR presuming it would be taken care of. On 1st Aug I received a message under sec 143 with a demand due for 4660/. The e-file status was showing the ITR is under process with O/S demand Nil (four Green tick was displayed). Till Aug 30th when I found the ITR is not accepted despite the grievances as cited above, again I paid the balance amount going thru the demand due option, there also I faced the same problem from bank. The amount could be debited on 31St Aug. I did pay the amount thinking the ITR and tax deposit are different Module. Moreover after filing ITR I made a query with the ITO regarding exemption of Transfer grant which should have been allowed at source. They denied it under pretext that no further exemption after filling. In order to see the last payment due appear under SAT head I had submitted a grievance which was not seen till I spoke to the help desk. One reply came with so many tags to file revised IT under section 131 (5). While I visited for re-file, I could see the interest amount along with an increased taxable income thus returned back. Now my questions are: 1. How the taxable income would vary when a letter under 143 is issued with a demand? 2. If I am to re-submit the ITR under Sec 131 (5) can I restrict the taxable income to the earlier one? 3. Can they alter the taxable income when Sec 143 is invoked? 4. Finally, should I conform to the query or wait till they make their earlier demand set right. Sir I had filled it by myself without the help of a professional. Your opinion would be mostly an antidote against the IT virus that has made me upset. Eagerly awaiting your reply.

I got a refund while filing my original ITR after that I need to revise the return and pay tax to government but in tds section the amount is reflecting now also which lead to the tax payment less