VIT Chennai ECE vs. SRM KTR ECE: Which is better for my son?

Ans: SRM Kattankulathur’s ECE program reports an 80–85% placement rate (2024) with 19% core roles in embedded systems and IoT, supported by partnerships like Atos for AI-driven automation research. Its NAAC A++ accreditation and NIRF #32 university ranking (2024) underscore academic rigor, though median salaries lag behind VIT. The curriculum emphasizes traditional electronics with labs in laser tech and equations, though limited AI/ML integration. VIT Chennai’s ECE boasts a 98% placement rate (2025) and QS World Ranking recognition, offering AI/ML electives and project-based learning aligned with IT sector demands. While VIT’s NIRF #11 engineering rank and 1,458+ recruiters (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon) ensure broader tech opportunities, only 30–40% of ECE graduates secure core roles, with most transitioning to software.

Recommendation: Opt for VIT Chennai ECE for higher placement assurance, interdisciplinary tech exposure, and institutional prestige, while choosing SRM Kattankulathur if prioritizing niche hardware collaborations (e.g., Atos) or cost-effective core electronics training. All the BEST for your Son's Admission & a Prosperous Future!

Follow RediffGURURS to Know More on 'Careers | Money | Health | Relationships'.