I have invested in VPF since 2008 and it has grown to 64lacs currently. But have not invested in NPS at all. Should I divert my monthly investment to NPS and start from zero or should I continue to invest in VPF to take advantage of compounding? Please suggest.
Ans: You have invested in VPF since 2008, and it has now grown to Rs. 64 lakhs. You are considering whether to continue VPF or start investing in NPS from scratch. Let’s analyze both options to determine the best approach.
Understanding VPF and NPS
VPF is an extension of EPF with tax benefits under EEE status, meaning contributions, interest, and withdrawals are completely tax-free. It provides fixed returns of around 8-8.5%, backed by the government. Withdrawals after 5 years are tax-free, making it a low-risk and stable option. However, it lacks equity exposure, limiting growth potential.
NPS, on the other hand, is a market-linked retirement scheme that offers a mix of equity and debt exposure. It has higher return potential (9-12%) but also comes with taxable withdrawals. Upon retirement, 40% of the corpus must be used for annuity, which is taxable. The extra Rs. 50,000 tax deduction under Section 80CCD(1B) is an added advantage, but NPS lacks liquidity as withdrawals are restricted until retirement.
Key Factors for Decision-Making
1. Compounding and Stability of VPF
VPF provides stable, tax-free compounding at 8%+ returns. Since you have been investing for 16 years, compounding is already working in your favor. The tax-free nature of both principal and interest makes it a highly efficient retirement tool.
2. Growth Potential and Risk in NPS
NPS has the potential to generate higher returns through equity exposure. However, it is also subject to market volatility. Additionally, the annuity requirement reduces flexibility, as a portion of the corpus is locked into a taxable pension.
3. Tax Efficiency and Withdrawal Flexibility
VPF is completely tax-free on withdrawal, while NPS has partially taxable withdrawals. If you start NPS now, the accumulated corpus will be small compared to VPF, reducing its impact on retirement planning. Since NPS funds remain locked until retirement, liquidity is limited.
Recommended Approach
Option 1: Continue VPF for Maximum Tax-Free Growth
If you want stability, predictable returns, and tax-free withdrawals, it is best to continue VPF. Your Rs. 64 lakhs corpus will keep compounding at 8%+, ensuring a risk-free retirement fund. Shifting to NPS would introduce market risk and annuity restrictions, which may not be necessary at this stage.
Option 2: Small Diversification to NPS for Tax Benefit
If you are looking for an additional tax benefit, you can invest Rs. 50,000 per year in NPS under Section 80CCD(1B). This will reduce taxable income while providing some exposure to equities. However, investing beyond this amount may limit liquidity and introduce unnecessary restrictions.
Final Insights
VPF is more efficient for retirement savings due to its tax-free nature, stable returns, and liquidity. NPS is suitable only for tax benefits, but the mandatory annuity requirement reduces flexibility. If needed, invest Rs. 50,000 yearly in NPS to optimize tax savings, but avoid diverting major funds from VPF to NPS. Continuing with VPF ensures compounding, stability, and tax-free growth, making it the better choice for retirement planning.
Best Regards,
K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
Chief Financial Planner,
www.holisticinvestment.in
https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment