Dear Sir,
I want to buy policy for retirement...shall i go with market link or no risk plan
My age is 48 years...pesently i have no health or any future plans...kindly suggest... as on many companies are providing such plans but they always fools if some body like me are new for this.. need your help..
Ans: I appreciate your question and your willingness to plan retirement carefully at age 48. There is no one “best” plan for everyone. But I will walk you through the trade-offs, risks, pros and cons of “market-linked” vs “no risk / guaranteed” policies, and then suggest a holistic approach given your age and situation.
» What “market-linked” and “no risk” plans mean
– A market-linked plan is one whose returns depend partly or fully on stock / equity markets (i.e. the insurer invests your premium in equity or unit-linked instruments).
– A no risk / guaranteed plan offers fixed returns, guaranteed benefits, minimal exposure to market fluctuations.
– Market-linked plans offer higher upside potential but carry volatility and downside risk.
– No risk plans give safety, predictability, but often lower returns, especially after inflation.
» Key considerations at your age (48 years)
– You have a shorter horizon to retirement than a younger person, so you can’t afford large negative drawdowns.
– You need a balance: some growth to beat inflation, and some safety to protect capital.
– Your health is a factor: if you develop health issues, having guaranteed benefits (or riders) helps.
– Liquidity is important: you should avoid locking all your money in policies you cannot access.
– Costs and charges in these plans often eat returns, so you must be wary.
» Advantages & drawbacks of market-linked (unit linked / equity linked) retirement policies
Advantages
– Potential for higher returns if markets perform well.
– You benefit from equity growth over time.
– You may have flexibility in switching between equity and debt within the policy.
Drawbacks / Risks
– Losses when markets fall. You might see your value drop, especially if you exit during downturns.
– More complex structure and higher charges (fund management fees, mortality charges, etc.).
– Returns are uncertain; you cannot reliably project future value.
– If you surrender early, penalties may apply and you may get much less.
» Advantages & drawbacks of no risk / guaranteed plans
Advantages
– Certainty of returns and principal (if assured by insurer).
– Peace of mind, especially close to or in retirement.
– Predictable cash flows, often useful in budgeting.
Drawbacks / Risks
– Often lower returns, may lag inflation over long term.
– The real return (after inflation) may be modest.
– Some guarantees depend on insurer’s credit strength — risk of insurer default, though rare.
– Many “guaranteed” plans have fine print, caps, and hidden conditions (e.g. guaranteed for limited period, or requiring large premiums).
» What your “ideal” retirement plan should blend
Given your age and goals, a pure market-linked or pure guaranteed plan alone is risky. A blended approach works better: some exposure to growth + some guaranteed portion.
You want enough growth to beat inflation, and enough safety to protect your capital as retirement approaches.
» Steps to design your retirement policy-plus investment strategy
Decide your target retirement corpus and income need
– Estimate how much monthly income you’ll need in retirement (after adjusting for inflation).
– Decide at what age you wish to retire.
Allocate between growth / market-linked and safe / guaranteed portions
– For example, allocate maybe 50-70% to market-linked part (for growth) and 30-50% to guaranteed / safer part.
– As you near retirement (say 5–7 years before), gradually shift more into safer part (reduce equity exposure).
Choose policy features carefully
– Look for flexibility in premium payment, ability to switch between funds, partial withdrawals, etc.
– Check charges: fund management fees, mortality charges, administrative fees. High charges erode benefits.
– Ensure the plan provides death benefit or riders as needed in your absence.
– Ensure there is a lock-in period suited to your tenure.
Compare projected returns net of charges
– Ask insurers to show “net returns after all charges” for both market-linked and guaranteed options.
– Compare with what you might achieve using mutual funds or other investments (outside policy) to see trade-offs.
Keep liquidity outside the policy
– Don’t invest all your funds into policy that is illiquid.
– Maintain an emergency reserve or liquid investments (bank, mutual funds) so you don’t force surrender.
Review periodically & shift allocations
– Every year, compare actual returns, health status, expenses, inflation.
– As you approach retirement, tilt more to the safer / guaranteed part.
– If a particular insurer underperforms or changes terms, be ready to switch (if permitted).
» What I would lean toward, given your age & lack of existing plans
I would favour a hybrid retirement policy with both market-linked and guaranteed components.
Start with a larger portion in market-linked for growth, but secure a base via guaranteed plan for safety.
Over time (say 10 years before your target retirement), gradually shift more to guaranteed portion.
Ensure the policy you pick is transparent in charges, flexible in fund switches, has good insurer track record, and allows partial withdrawals.
» Why not pure no risk / guaranteed or pure market-linked alone
– Pure guaranteed may leave you behind inflation, leaving your real purchasing power eroded.
– Pure market-linked is risky, especially as you get closer to retirement — you may be forced to sell at a time when markets are down.
– A middle path balances risk and reward.
» Caveats & what to watch out for
– Many insurers market “guarantees” which are conditional, or apply only after long durations, or have disclaimers.
– Always read the fine print: guaranteed returns, caps, minimum guarantees, mortality costs, surrender charges.
– Sometimes insurers reduce guaranteed interest rates in future — making “guaranteed” less generous.
– Ensure the insurer is financially strong and rated well.
– Avoid policies that lock your money for too long without any flexibility.
– Ensure you can add riders (health, critical illness) if needed, or purchase separate health insurance (because policy may not suffice).
» Interaction with your overall investments & tax perspective
– Treat the retirement policy as one pillar among others (mutual funds, fixed deposits, etc.).
– If you already have mutual funds / savings, don’t redirect all into policy.
– Use active investment options (not index funds) in the market-linked portion (if your policy allows) so fund managers can manage risk and seek alpha.
– Over time, your non-policy investments can cushion the risk if policy underperforms.
– Regarding taxes: some retirement policies have tax benefits under current laws. But the returns you receive may also be taxed. Always check after-tax yields.
» Example of how allocation could evolve
– Suppose you pick a policy with both components. In the first 5–7 years, 60-70% allocated to market-linked, 30-40% to guaranteed.
– As you near retirement (say last 5 years), gradually shift to 40% market, 60% guaranteed (or more).
– This reduces volatility risk close to retirement.
– The guaranteed portion ensures you have a baseline minimum return.
– The equity portion provides growth and inflation protection.
» Final Insights
Choosing between market-linked and no risk plans is not an either / or choice. At your age, the wiser route is to combine both. Begin with more weight on growth (market-linked) and a solid guaranteed base. Over time, shift gradually toward safety. Always check charges, flexibility, insurer strength, and make sure you maintain liquidity outside the policy. With this balanced approach, you can protect capital, gain growth, and approach retirement more securely.
Best Regards,
K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
Chief Financial Planner,
www.holisticinvestment.in
https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment