Need Expert Advice?Our Gurus Can Help

Ramalingam Kalirajan |8317 Answers |Ask -Follow

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on May 29, 2024

Ramalingam Kalirajan has over 23 years of experience in mutual funds and financial planning.
He has an MBA in finance from the University of Madras and is a certified financial planner.
He is the director and chief financial planner at Holistic Investment, a Chennai-based firm that offers financial planning and wealth management advice.... more

Question by PARTHA on Apr 05, 2023Hindi

Listen

Dear Sir, I am 53 years, and planning to do SWP for Rs. 3 Lacs ...it would be better than MIS in Bank/PO.... what is minimum/maximum return may earn in SWP whether itis monthy/qtly/yearly......Partha P. Chowdhury..

Ans: Assessment of Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP) vs. Monthly Income Scheme (MIS):

Understanding Your Financial Situation:

At 53 years of age, planning for regular income streams is a prudent financial decision as you approach retirement.
Your consideration of SWP as an alternative to Monthly Income Scheme (MIS) in banks or post offices reflects a proactive approach towards optimizing your income sources.
Evaluation of Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP):

SWP allows you to withdraw a fixed sum periodically from your mutual fund investments, providing a steady income stream.
Unlike MIS in banks or post offices, SWP offers the flexibility to choose withdrawal frequencies such as monthly, quarterly, or yearly based on your cash flow requirements.
SWP from mutual funds potentially offers higher returns compared to MIS, as mutual funds invest in a diversified portfolio of assets, including equities, which have the potential for capital appreciation over the long term.
Assessment of Potential Returns:

The minimum and maximum returns from SWP depend on various factors such as the underlying performance of the mutual fund scheme, market conditions, and the chosen withdrawal frequency.
While SWP provides the opportunity for capital appreciation and higher returns over the long term, it also exposes your investments to market volatility, which may impact the returns.
Historical data suggests that equity-oriented mutual funds have delivered average annual returns ranging from 10% to 15% over the long term, although past performance does not guarantee future results.
By diversifying your investments across asset classes and opting for a systematic withdrawal approach, you can mitigate risk and potentially enhance returns over time.
Comparison with Monthly Income Scheme (MIS):

MIS in banks or post offices typically offer fixed interest rates, providing predictable but relatively lower returns compared to equity-oriented mutual funds.
While MIS offers capital protection and stable income, it may not keep pace with inflation, leading to a decline in purchasing power over time.
SWP from mutual funds, on the other hand, has the potential to generate inflation-beating returns and preserve the purchasing power of your capital over the long term.
Recommendations:

Considering your age and income requirements, SWP from mutual funds can be a suitable option to generate regular income while potentially achieving higher returns compared to traditional income schemes.
Consult with a Certified Financial Planner to assess your risk tolerance, investment objectives, and cash flow needs to determine the most appropriate withdrawal frequency and mutual fund schemes for your SWP strategy.
In conclusion, SWP from mutual funds offers the flexibility, potential for capital appreciation, and inflation-beating returns that may be superior to traditional income schemes like MIS in banks or post offices, provided it aligns with your risk profile and financial goals.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,
Chief Financial Planner,
www.holisticinvestment.in

DISCLAIMER: The content of this post by the expert is the personal view of the rediffGURU. Users are advised to pursue the information provided by the rediffGURU only as a source of information to be as a point of reference and to rely on their own judgement when making a decision.