Home > Money > Question
Need Expert Advice?Our Gurus Can Help
Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |7330 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on Jun 30, 2024

Ramalingam Kalirajan has over 23 years of experience in mutual funds and financial planning.
He has an MBA in finance from the University of Madras and is a certified financial planner.
He is the director and chief financial planner at Holistic Investment, a Chennai-based firm that offers financial planning and wealth management advice.... more
Vikash Question by Vikash on Jun 30, 2024Hindi
Money

I have read your detailed responses to various questions and you take out a lot of time to address these questions - that's great. But, I have two questions on some common points that you generally include in your responses: 1. "While index funds have lower fees, they lack the potential for higher returns that actively managed funds offer. They simply track the market and do not aim to outperform it." - have you seen the SPIVA report on India? Most active funds don't beat the index, over a long term. This has also been proven in more mature international markets like USA. 2. Regular funds vs. direct funds - you keep on recommending regular funds. Is it not true that the difference between the regular and indirect funds is the distributor commission, while the funds are managed by the same fund manager? If there is a 0.5% difference in expense ratio per year between direct and indirect funds, what would be the difference in asset value in 10 years? Are you not conflicted by recommending funds that generate higher commissions for you - active, regular, etc.? Can you please disclose the conflict clearly including quantifying the impact on investor?

Ans: I appreciate your questions and the opportunity to clarify these important points. Let’s dive into the specifics of why active funds and regular funds can be advantageous in the Indian market.

Active Funds vs. Index Funds: The Indian Context
Active funds and index funds both have their merits. However, the performance and suitability of these funds can vary significantly between markets like India and more mature ones like the USA.

The Case for Active Funds in India
Potential for Higher Returns:

Active funds have the potential to outperform the market. Skilled fund managers can leverage market inefficiencies to generate higher returns.
In emerging markets like India, there are more opportunities for active fund managers to identify undervalued stocks and sectors.
SPIVA Report Insights:

The SPIVA report does highlight that many active funds struggle to beat the index over the long term. However, this is not a universal truth for all funds or all periods.
In India, where market inefficiencies are more prevalent compared to developed markets, active fund managers have a better chance to add value.
Localized Expertise:

Fund managers with deep knowledge of the Indian market can navigate its complexities better than a passive index fund.
They can adjust portfolios in response to economic changes, regulatory shifts, and company-specific developments.
Regular Funds vs. Direct Funds: Understanding the Differences
Regular funds and direct funds are managed by the same fund managers and invest in the same securities. The key difference lies in the cost structure and the value of advisory services.

The Value of Regular Funds
Advisor Support:

Investing through a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) or Mutual Fund Distributor (MFD) offers the benefit of professional advice.
A good MFD helps in creating a personalized investment strategy, regular portfolio reviews, and timely adjustments based on market conditions.
Behavioral Gap Reduction:

The Dalbar study shows a significant gap between investor returns and investment returns, often due to poor timing decisions by investors.
An MFD can help reduce this behavioral gap by providing emotional support and rational advice, ensuring that investors stay the course during market volatility.
Performance-Linked Compensation:

MFDs are compensated based on the portfolio value, which aligns their interests with those of the investor.
When the portfolio performs well, both the investor and the MFD benefit, creating a win-win situation.
Regulated Expense Ratios:

SEBI regulates expense ratios, ensuring they remain within reasonable limits.
While direct funds have lower expense ratios, the value added by an MFD in terms of returns, advice, and support can far outweigh the cost difference.
Quantifying the Impact
Expense Ratio Difference:

The 0.5% difference in expense ratios between regular and direct funds is significant over time.
However, the additional returns generated by following professional advice and the reduction in behavioral errors can more than compensate for this difference.
Performance Over Time:

Assuming a well-managed active fund generates 1-2% higher returns than an index fund, the impact on long-term wealth creation is substantial.
Over a decade, this can lead to a significant difference in portfolio value, justifying the higher expense ratio.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Transparency and Ethics:

It’s important to acknowledge that recommending regular funds can appear self-serving due to the commission structure.
However, a good MFD prioritizes the investor’s interests, as their compensation is linked to the portfolio’s performance.
Quantifying the Benefit:

The value added by an MFD through expert advice, personalized strategies, and emotional support can significantly enhance investor returns.
The cost difference of 0.5% in expense ratios is a small price to pay for potentially higher overall returns and a more disciplined investment approach.
Final Insights
Investing in active funds and opting for regular funds through a professional MFD can be highly beneficial in the Indian context. The expertise, support, and personalized advice provided by an MFD can lead to better investment decisions, reduced behavioral gaps, and ultimately higher returns. While the expense ratios might be slightly higher, the value added by professional guidance often outweighs the cost.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP

Chief Financial Planner,

www.holisticinvestment.in
DISCLAIMER: The content of this post by the expert is the personal view of the rediffGURU. Users are advised to pursue the information provided by the rediffGURU only as a source of information to be as a point of reference and to rely on their own judgement when making a decision.
Money

You may like to see similar questions and answers below

Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |7330 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on May 22, 2024

Listen
Money
Dear guru, I have been investing in regular mutual funds (both lumpsum and SIP) since 2014 through an agent whose is a family friend. Recently my wife told me about the hude difference in returns between sirect and regular plans. I am grateful to the agent for getting me an XIRR of 18% on my investment but at the same time I believe I have paid him enough commission for his services. 1 have 2 questions: 1. How much will I loose if i continue with regular plans for another 5 years? 2. How do I switch to direct plans without denting his commission too much? Thank you, Anand, Delhi
Ans: Dear Anand,

Thank you for sharing your investment journey and your thoughtful questions. It's great to hear that you've been investing consistently and achieving an impressive XIRR of 18% since 2014. This shows your commitment to securing a strong financial future.

Evaluating Your Current Investment Approach
The Role of Your Agent
Your agent, who is also a family friend, has played a significant role in helping you achieve these returns. Their guidance and support have been valuable, and it's important to appreciate their contributions.

Regular vs. Direct Plans
It's true that direct plans have lower expense ratios compared to regular plans. However, the difference in returns may not always justify switching, especially when considering the value of professional advice.

Financial Impact of Staying with Regular Plans
Understanding the Cost Difference
Regular plans have a higher expense ratio because they include a commission for the agent. Direct plans, on the other hand, do not have this commission, leading to potentially higher returns.

Potential Loss Calculation
While the exact amount you'll lose by staying with regular plans for another five years depends on various factors, the difference could be around 0.5% to 1% annually in returns. However, it's crucial to weigh this against the benefits of professional advice and support from your agent.

Importance of Professional Guidance
The guidance from your agent has helped you achieve a solid 18% XIRR, which is commendable. This shows the value of having someone knowledgeable to guide your investment decisions, especially during volatile market conditions.

The Ethical Consideration
Gratitude and Respect
It's important to express gratitude and respect towards your agent, who has helped you achieve significant financial growth. Switching to direct plans might feel like bypassing someone who has been instrumental in your financial journey.

Impact on Relationship
Bypassing your agent could potentially affect your personal and professional relationship. Maintaining a good relationship with your agent is beneficial for future investment decisions and continued support.

How to Proceed
Continued Investment in Regular Plans
Continuing with regular plans ensures that you keep receiving professional advice and support. The slightly higher expense ratio can be seen as a fee for this valuable guidance.

Consider Hybrid Approach
If you still wish to explore direct plans, you could consider a hybrid approach. Invest a portion of your funds in direct plans while keeping the majority in regular plans. This way, you can experience the benefits of both approaches.

Open Communication
Discuss your concerns and thoughts with your agent. A transparent conversation can help find a mutually beneficial solution. They might even offer to help you with direct plans or reduce their commission.

Long-Term Perspective
Focus on Long-Term Goals
Your investment decisions should align with your long-term financial goals. The guidance from your agent has proven beneficial, and their continued support can help you navigate future market challenges.

Risk Management
Your agent helps in managing risks and making informed decisions. This professional support can protect your investments during market downturns and help capitalize on opportunities.

Conclusion
Switching to direct plans solely to save on expense ratios might not be the best move. The professional guidance and support you receive from your agent are valuable and have contributed to your impressive returns. Maintaining this relationship and valuing their contributions can lead to continued financial success.

Final Thoughts

Balancing financial efficiency with professional guidance is crucial. Appreciate the support from your agent and consider discussing your concerns with them to find the best path forward.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP

Chief Financial Planner

www.holisticinvestment.in

..Read more

Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |7330 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on Oct 07, 2024

Money
While active funds can add value, the SPIVA data is clear that most active funds underperform the index over the long term, even in India. The cost of active management (higher expense ratios) can erode the benefits of potential outperformance. For consistent, long-term growth, index funds are often a safer bet, especially since lower fees compound to your advantage over time. While the behavioral support argument has merit (and studies like DALBAR show that emotional mistakes cost investors a lot), investing in direct funds and getting professional advice separately (via fee-only advisors) is a more cost-efficient route. The savings in expense ratios between direct and regular funds will compound significantly over the years, and you can still seek advice on a fixed fee basis if needed. Ramalingam’s defense of regular funds and active management is based on the assumption that advisory support and market inefficiencies will consistently add value. However: The data (SPIVA) still shows that most active funds underperform in the long run. Expense ratios compound over time, and a 0.5% difference between regular and direct funds is significant. There is indeed a conflict of interest in commission-based models, and while some MFDs genuinely prioritize their clients’ goals, the lower-cost direct funds give you more transparency and control over your costs. Fee-only advisors can offer unbiased advice without the embedded conflict, and you can still get ongoing support for your investments without paying a percentage-based commission.
Ans: Investing in mutual funds is a crucial part of wealth creation for many individuals in India. The choice between active and index funds often leads to intense discussions. Each has its advantages, yet the performance and suitability can differ significantly in the Indian market compared to more developed economies.

The Case for Active Funds in India
Potential for Higher Returns
Active funds are designed to outperform the market through the expertise of skilled fund managers. These professionals aim to leverage market inefficiencies to generate returns above the index. In emerging markets like India, these inefficiencies present numerous opportunities.

Market Opportunities: Active fund managers can identify undervalued stocks and sectors that may be overlooked by passive strategies.

Proactive Management: By actively managing their portfolios, fund managers can make adjustments in response to market changes, providing the potential for better returns.

SPIVA Report Insights
The SPIVA report provides critical insights into the performance of active funds. While it indicates that many active funds struggle to beat the index over the long term, it's essential to interpret these findings in context.

Not Universal: The underperformance is not a blanket truth for all funds or all periods. Some active funds do excel, especially in less efficient markets like India.

Emerging Market Dynamics: The Indian market's complexities and inefficiencies can work to the advantage of skilled managers. Their local expertise can lead to better investment decisions.

Localized Expertise
Investing in India requires a deep understanding of its unique market conditions.

Market Nuances: Fund managers with experience in the Indian market can better navigate its complexities.

Economic Adjustments: They can quickly adjust portfolios in response to regulatory changes, economic shifts, and company-specific developments, potentially leading to higher returns.

Regular Funds vs. Direct Funds: Understanding the Differences
Both regular and direct funds are managed by the same professionals and invest in identical securities. The fundamental distinction lies in their cost structure and the added value of advisory services.

The Value of Regular Funds
Investing through a Certified Financial Planner (CFP) or Mutual Fund Distributor (MFD) offers numerous advantages.

Advisor Support: A competent MFD can provide personalized investment strategies, conduct regular portfolio reviews, and make timely adjustments based on market conditions.

Behavioral Gap Reduction: Studies like DALBAR show that investors often underperform due to emotional decisions. An MFD can mitigate these behavioral gaps by offering rational advice, helping investors stay on course during market fluctuations.

Performance-Linked Compensation: MFDs often receive commissions based on portfolio performance. This alignment of interests fosters a win-win situation for both the investor and the MFD.

Regulated Expense Ratios
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulates expense ratios for mutual funds, ensuring they remain reasonable.

Cost Structure: While direct funds generally have lower expense ratios, the value added by an MFD in terms of personalized advice and support can often outweigh the cost difference.
Quantifying the Impact
Understanding the financial implications of choosing between regular and direct funds is essential for informed decision-making.

Expense Ratio Difference
The difference in expense ratios between regular and direct funds can seem minor—around 0.5%. However, this discrepancy is significant over time.

Compounding Effects: Lower expense ratios in direct funds can lead to considerable savings that compound over the years.

Performance-Linked Gains: If an MFD's guidance results in additional returns that exceed this difference, the overall value added justifies the slightly higher expense ratio.

Performance Over Time
A well-managed active fund has the potential to generate 1-2% higher returns than index funds.

Long-Term Wealth Creation: Over a decade, this performance difference can lead to substantial variations in portfolio value, providing a compelling reason to consider regular funds.
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
It’s vital to acknowledge potential conflicts of interest in commission-based models. However, not all MFDs operate with the same intent.

Transparency and Ethics
Prioritizing Investor Interests: Good MFDs genuinely prioritize their clients’ goals. Their compensation structure, tied to portfolio performance, aligns their interests with those of the investors.

Unbiased Advice: The value added by an MFD extends beyond simple returns. Expert advice, personalized strategies, and emotional support can enhance overall investor outcomes.

Quantifying the Benefit
Long-Term Value: The combination of expert advice and performance-linked compensation can significantly improve investor returns, making the 0.5% cost difference appear small in comparison.
Final Insights
Investing in active funds and selecting regular funds through a professional MFD can be highly advantageous in the Indian context.

Expertise and Support: The expertise and personalized advice provided by an MFD can lead to better investment decisions, reduced behavioral gaps, and ultimately higher returns.

Cost vs. Value: While expense ratios for regular funds may be higher, the added value from professional guidance often justifies the costs.

Aligning Interests: The performance-linked compensation model in the MFD space fosters a collaborative environment that benefits both investors and advisors.

Fee-Only Advisors: Fee-only advisors, while offering unbiased advice, have a limited presence in India. The evolution of the RIA ecosystem could lead to a more performance-linked fee structure, enhancing the value they provide.

Investing is not merely about costs; it’s about informed choices and strategic support. By considering both active funds and professional advice, you position yourself for a more robust investment journey.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,

Chief Financial Planner,

www.holisticinvestment.in

https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment

..Read more

Ramalingam

Ramalingam Kalirajan  |7330 Answers  |Ask -

Mutual Funds, Financial Planning Expert - Answered on Oct 09, 2024

Listen
Money
Thanks a lot for your customized time given assessment of my financial standing . Your point wise holistic feedback is very much praiseworthy. Seriously , i was not expecting such a analytical view. Thanks again. Few point which you may ponder upon to the deep and advise specifically. 1.Let's say , in large cap space i'm into SBI bluechip fund from 2016 onwards. When comparing with peers from alpha, beta, sharpe ,volatility, XIRR perspective , Nippon large cap, ICICI Pru BlueChip Gr looks stronger . Shall I change ? 2. As advised by you, I'll stop Franklin ,HDFC . 3. I would like to continue with Parag flexi cap, Kotak emerging , Nippon Small cap as performance seems good though not among the top. What's your take on this ? Do you advise differently ? 4. If you can suggest changes with specific fund also, it is very much welcome .
Ans: If you're comparing SBI Bluechip with Nippon and ICICI on factors like alpha, beta, and Sharpe ratios, it’s essential to think long-term. Switching funds may seem tempting, but consider consistency and manager expertise. As for your preference to continue Parag Flexi Cap, Kotak Emerging, and Nippon Small Cap, their performance can be strong despite not being top-ranked. Always consult a Certified Financial Planner or Mutual Fund Distributor for tailored advice before making specific changes based on performance metrics and your risk profile.

Best Regards,

K. Ramalingam, MBA, CFP,

Chief Financial Planner,

www.holisticinvestment.in

https://www.youtube.com/@HolisticInvestment

..Read more

Latest Questions
Milind

Milind Vadjikar  |795 Answers  |Ask -

Insurance, Stocks, MF, PF Expert - Answered on Dec 24, 2024

Asked by Anonymous - Dec 24, 2024Hindi
Listen
Money
Hello i am almost 30 now I have invested around 40 lakhs in Market (mutual funds plus equity) 6 lakhs ppf maybe 2 lakhs pf I have parental property of combining around 2.5cr I have my parents helath insurance from a private insurance company, also covered by cghs health scheme,so no major worries about health expenses, for me i have 10lakhs health insurance Apart from this we have family pension also. As of now overall i have a monthly income of around 2-2.25 lakhs. I have a car a bike a scooty all valid for next 8-10 years What should be my goal amount for the retirement, i want it as early as possible As per the current scenario i am assuming i will live max till 75 years age. As of now i can invest 80-90k per month Yet to be married i assume i need atleast Lakhs per month as of now What should be the ideal amount with which i can retire
Ans: Hello;

Hope you have adequate term life insurance for yourself.

You may start a monthly sip of 90 K in a combination of pure equity mutual funds.

After 10 years your sip and lumpsum investment will grow into sums of 2.09 and 1.24 Cr respectively.

This adds upto 3.33 Cr. If you add your ppf and EPF corpus then this should add upto a sum of around 4 Cr.

If you invest this corpus in a conservative hybrid debt fund and do a SWP at the rate of 3.5%, you may expect a post tax monthly income of
1 L+.

As you get married your expenses will rise as also the need to plan for various other goals.

Therefore the decision to retire from regular 9-6 job should be backed up with alternate business plan or such other plan to monetize your hobbies that may yield income over atleast next 10-15 years.

Best wishes;

...Read more

Radheshyam

Radheshyam Zanwar  |1112 Answers  |Ask -

MHT-CET, IIT-JEE, NEET-UG Expert - Answered on Dec 24, 2024

Listen
Career
Hello! Read your article of studying MBBS abroad. One question - after completing MBBS abroad, how can a student enter the Indian Market to do practising, is there any exam to appear, if so, the passing marks and in which hospitals the student can practice (Government or Private). Second Question: For studying Post - Graduation, will the abroad degree of MBBS will work for the entrance test for PG or any other option to take admission for PG? Thanking you Regards, Madhuri Shinde
Ans: Hello Madhuri.
First of all, thank you for reading the article so quickly and showing your faith in rediffGuru.
Here is the point-wise reply to your queries:
(1) To practice in India, the candidate has to appear for the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination (FMGE) conducted by the National Medical Commission (NMC) or National Board of Examinations (NBE)
(2) Passing Marks: A minimum of 50%
(3) The candidate can practice either in Govt or Private hospital
(4) One has to decide from which country he wants to do PG. As far as India is concerned, the candidate has to appear for the NEET PG entrance test. There are no direct PG admissions in India without NEET-PG if the candidate seeks an NMC-recognized PG qualification.
Finally, If you plan to pursue a PG degree abroad, ensure that the institution and course are recognized by the NMC to practice in India upon your return.

If satisfied, please like and follow me.
If dissatisfied with the reply, please ask again without hesitation.
Thanks.

Radheshyam

...Read more

DISCLAIMER: The content of this post by the expert is the personal view of the rediffGURU. Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related document carefully before investing. The securities quoted are for illustration only and are not recommendatory. Users are advised to pursue the information provided by the rediffGURU only as a source of information and as a point of reference and to rely on their own judgement when making a decision. RediffGURUS is an intermediary as per India's Information Technology Act.

Close  

You haven't logged in yet. To ask a question, Please Log in below
Login

A verification OTP will be sent to this
Mobile Number / Email

Enter OTP
A 6 digit code has been sent to

Resend OTP in120seconds

Dear User, You have not registered yet. Please register by filling the fields below to get expert answers from our Gurus
Sign up

By signing up, you agree to our
Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Already have an account?

Enter OTP
A 6 digit code has been sent to Mobile

Resend OTP in120seconds

x