As per my experience if you have good expeirence of 30+ years in their fields but those having literature professional qualification. Even though the person who have 30+ yrs.experience have also good records builtup wd the staff/ colleague a coordial relationship in the interest of Organization betterment. In ur opinion who will.be better candidate either litr.professional holding who have only 1/2 yr. Exp. Or who have non professional wd 30+ yrs.good experience holder candidate? RAWAT CS

Ans: The choice between a candidate with a professional qualification and less experience versus a candidate with extensive experience but no professional qualification can depend on several factors. Here are some considerations:

Role Requirements: Some roles may require specific professional qualifications, regardless of experience. In such cases, the candidate with the qualification would be preferred.
Nature of Work: If the role involves practical, hands-on tasks that one learns over time, a candidate with extensive experience might be more suitable.
Organizational Culture: Some organizations value formal education and qualifications, while others prioritize practical experience.
Future Goals: If the role is expected to evolve in a direction that requires the skills taught in the professional qualification, the professionally qualified candidate might be a better fit.
In general, both professional qualifications and experience are valuable, and the “better” candidate would depend on the specific circumstances and requirements of the role. It’s also worth noting that many organizations value a mix of both formal education and practical experience. Ultimately, the decision would be based on who would add the most value to the organization and the role.